Howto:CH - Nexphone - Nexphone Business Trunk SIP-Provider 2024

From innovaphone wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Summary

Tests for the Nexphone business trunk SIP trunk product of the provider Nexphone were completed. Test results have been last updated on April 17th, 2024. Check the history of this article for the date of the first publication of the testreport.


List of Issues found in media-relay Configuration

180 RINGING
The provider does not send a 180 Ringing response when the called party alerts.
FAX T38 ONNET
The provider does not support T.38 fax for onnet calls.
FAX T38
The provider does not fully support T.38 fax
MOBILITY
The provider can not send DTMF signals via SIP-INFO messages.
REVERSE MEDIA
The provider does not support reverse media negotiation (a.k.a. late SDP)
SIP INFO
The provider does not support conveying DTMF using the SIP-INFO method.

Here is the list of test-cases that have been performed for this provider: 180_RINGING, BASIC_CALL, CLIR, CLNS_ONNET, CLNS, CONN_NR_DIFF, CONN_NR_INCOMING, CONN_NR, DTMF, EARLY_MEDIA_INBOUND, FAX_AUDIO, FAX_T38_ONNET, FAX_T38, FAX_T38ANDAUDIO, G711A_ONNET, G711A, G711U_ONNET, G711U, G722_ONNET, G722, G729_ONNET, G729, HOLD_RETRIEVE, IP_FRAGMENTATION, LARGE_SIP_MESSAGES, MOBILITY, OPUS_NB, OPUS_WB, RALERT_DISC, REDIR_302, REDIR_DIVHDR, REDIR_HISTHDR, REVERSE_MEDIA, SDP_ICE, SDP_RTCP_MUX, SDP_VIDEO, SIP_INFO, SRTP_INCOMING, SRTP_INTERNAL, SRTP_OUTGOING, SUBSCRIBER_NR, XFER_BLIND, XFER_CONS_ALERT, XFER_CONS_EXT, XFER_CONS


Test Results

This SIP provider requires a media-relay configuration. That is, all media traffic between the SIP provider and all endpoints must flow through the SBC. For this reason, a configuration without media-relay has not been tested and hence no test results for this configuration are listed.

Configuration with media-relay

Registration
The provider supports only UDP as transport protocol. As a result, the SIP-communication is not encrypted(TLS). Moreover it requires all involved network elements to support IP-fragmentation.
NAT Traversal
The provider detects clients behind NAT and can handle calls to them without requiring the clients to use NAT-traversal methods like STUN.
DTMF (RFC2833)
The provider can convey DTMF digits using the RTP payload method as per RFC2833.
Session Timer
The tests regarding the SIP-session timer were not successful. This will result in unwanted call termination on calls exceeding a certain time (default 30 minutes). Because of this, further tests were aborted.
Redundancy
Registration of two SIP-interfaces on the same SIP-account is not supported by the provider. As a result, you cannot have a Standby gateway/PBX using the same account for failover or load-balancing purposes.
Correct signalling of Ringing-state
Ringing is not signalled by the provider. This will lead to incorrect call-state display on the PBX (phone-UI, myPBX, Soap) for outbound calls to the PSTN. The caller will see no status-update on the phone-display/PC-screen, showing that the remote party was reached and is ringing.
Additionally external callers forwarded/transferred back to the PSTN, may get no ring-tone but hear silence while the remote party is ringing. This silence while waiting might lead to aborting the call. As a result, Carrier w/o Alerting is required in all PBX 'Mobility' objects.
CLIR
OK
Clip No Screening (CLNS)
Straight clip no screening (i.e. sending a foreign number as calling line id) works fine. As this works anyway, it does not matter, if the provider supports the interpretation of History-Info: or Diversion: SIP headers for providing the correct calling line id for diverted calls. This provider supports call redirection using the SIP 302 Redirect header. Rerouting can be enabled by setting the Reroute supported check-mark in the corresponding Trunk object configuration. Also, the Interworking check-mark must be set in the route used for calls from and to the SIP provider.
However, during our test other interop problems were discovered when the Interworking Flag is enabled. Therefore it is not recommended to use the call redirection via SIP 302 Redirect header.
COLP
Outbound and inbound calls to/from the PSTN show the correct connected number.
For outbound calls to the PSTN, an update of the connected number is not signalled to the caller.
Early-Media
The provider supports early-media for outbound calls (hence inbound early media) to the PSTN.
Fax
Transport of faxes to/from the PSTN via G.711 codec was tested successfully.
Transport of faxes using T.38 failed to PSTN and onnet destinations. Fallback to audio-fax worked.
As a result, T.38 is enabled on the SIP-interface, the use of audio-fax is necessary.
Codecs
supported to/from PSTN: G711A
supported onnet (VoIP to VoIP): G711A, G711U, G722 and G729
IP-Fragmentation
OK
Large SIP messages
OK
Reverse Media Negotiation
Reverse-media negotiation is not supported. Therefore, a media-relay with exclusive coder configuration will be activated on the SIP-interface.
Mobility Calls
Transmitting DTMF-tones as SIP-INFO messages is not supported, however mobility calls are still possible as in the media-relay configuration, the SBC will convey DTMF signalling to the PBX.
As the provider does not provide proper alert signalling, you will need to configure the Carrier w/o Alerting check-mark in the PBX Mobility object.
SRTP
The provider does not support audio encryption using SRTP.
Dialing of Subscriber Numbers
OK
Call Transfer
OK


Configuration

Use profile CH-Nexphone-Nexphone_business_trunk in Gateway/Interfaces/SIP to configure this SIP provider.

Please note the following configuration hints:

  • Alert not signalled, 'Carrier w/o Alerting' required in all PBX 'Mobility' objects
A most recent v14r1 firmware is required to use this SIP-profile. For hints regarding upgrade to v14r1, see Howto:V14_Firmware_Upgrade_V13r3_V14r1

New profiles are added in the course of our V14R1 software Service Releases, see Reference14r1:Release Notes Firmware. Here is an up to date list of tested SIP providers.

Disclaimer

These tests look at a number of interoperability scenarios between innovaphone SIP devices and a given SIP trunk product. As we are enhancing our testing procedures, nature and number of these tests will vary.

All test results document the fact how the tested combination performs in the tested scenario. It explicitly does not comment on the question what the reason is for the behaviour nor if and how it could be changed. It thus does not imply that either the SIP trunk provider or the innovaphone device fails in any way. It merely says that the combination does not perform as defined by the test.

If not mentioned otherwise, all tests are repeated on a weekly basis (a.k.a. nightly tests) using the then-current innovaphone firmware. If a tested combination keeps performing differently from the state documented here during nightly tests, we reserve the right to update this article accordingly.

Some tests do not have consistent results. This may occur for various reasons. If so, we document the tests result as being unstable.

Some of the tested SIP trunk products are not available for nightly tests. In this case, the fact will be noted in the Summary section.