Template:SIP Profile Test NAT d b no c a: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: The provider cannot handle calls to clients behind NAT. Clients are requires to use NAT-traversal methods like STUN. Drawback of this solution is that STUN doesn't work for all NAT routers...) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The provider cannot handle calls to clients behind NAT. Clients are requires to use NAT-traversal methods like STUN. Drawback of this solution is that STUN doesn't work for all NAT routers (i.e. routers doing symmetric NAT). Because of this limitation, it depends on the customer network equipment whether the SIP- | The provider cannot handle calls to clients behind NAT. Clients are requires to use NAT-traversal methods like STUN. Drawback of this solution is that STUN doesn't work for all NAT routers (i.e. routers doing symmetric NAT). Because of this limitation, it depends on the customer network equipment whether the SIP-trunk is usable or not. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:54, 29 July 2016
The provider cannot handle calls to clients behind NAT. Clients are requires to use NAT-traversal methods like STUN. Drawback of this solution is that STUN doesn't work for all NAT routers (i.e. routers doing symmetric NAT). Because of this limitation, it depends on the customer network equipment whether the SIP-trunk is usable or not.